“This was our
first act of nationhood in the eyes of a watching world” – Julia Gillard, Anzac
Day Address, 2012
Was Anzac Day, as Julia Gillard put it, “our first act of nationhood” or a catastrophe for a young nation, one that would take us decades to recover from?
Was Anzac Day, as Julia Gillard put it, “our first act of nationhood” or a catastrophe for a young nation, one that would take us decades to recover from?
I was very
interested to see Tony Jones’ interview with Australian Historian Ross McMullin
on ABC’s Lateline on Anzac Day.
McMullin’s book Farewell, Dear People: Biographies Of Australia’s Lost Generation (Scribe, 2012) tells the
stories of some of those who didn’t come back from WW1 and reflects on the
outstanding potential that was lost to Australia and the world. I haven’t yet read the book, but I will. In his interview on Lateline it really seemed
that a different reading of Anzac day was being proposed – perhaps a less
idealistic and romanticized one than the version we are regularly fed by the
media and our politicians.
The 25th
of April, 1915 wasn’t the day that forged our national identity – it was a day
when Australia’s potential was diminished, followed by many other days when
even more of our youngest and brightest were killed, their potential ended and
the potential of Australia as a young nation went with them.
If all those
thousands of young men had not been slaughtered, if they had been allowed to
live out their lives and reach their potential, can you imagine the society
that they would have contributed to?
What would our society, our national identity, be like today? In many ways Australia punches above its
weight in various arenas, despite the decimation of our population in the early
20th century. Imagine what we
might have achieved had these men grown to old age. Would we have the
chip on our shoulder, the tall poppy syndrome and the various other
characteristics we have come to equate with our national identity?
I hope that by
the time we get to the centenary of Anzac day that we as a nation might start
to re-think this national trope of Australian Character forged on the
battlefields of WW1, a sign of our warrior nationhood. After 100 years, and still sending our
youngest and brightest to war, maybe we can rethink how a war nearly 100 years
ago shaped us as a Nation. Perhaps we accept
the reality that rather than strengthening and galvanizing us as a nation, that
it actually damaged us as a country, crippled and brutalized and traumatised
thousands and thousands of people, in addition to those that died, stripped us
of much of the potential of the young century and set us back decades in terms
of what we might, as a nation, have achieved.
As Ross
McMullin puts it, before WW1, “…we were on the way to establishing in Australia
an advanced, progressive society that was seen widely elsewhere as an advanced
social laboratory […] for other people to come, as they often did, from
overseas, they crossed the globe to look at, scrutinise, assess, this advanced
social laboratory. And the war blew all that away, and after the war we were no
longer seen as an advanced social laboratory and there were no more such
visitors.” (transcript of Interview with Tony Jones, Lateline)
The significance
of our ‘National’ days has never sat well with me. Australia day – the start of an ongoing
disaster for Australia’s first people. Anzac Day – a commemoration of brutal and
arguably pointless slaughter. Yet we
chose to mark these days as days of celebration and commemoration. I say this as the daughter of an army man. My father was a career soldier; the army gave
him many opportunities and the chance at an alternative life to that of a poor,
under educated dairy farmer. But my
father never joined the RSL, never in my living memory went on an Anzac day march. Although it was never said aloud, war was not
something to celebrate or commemorate – but rather something to try and move on
from. Not to forget, but not to remember
either. War is a truly terrible thing. My father was deeply scarred and traumatised
by his experiences in battle. Having to
kill someone is not something that would be easy to live with. I remember my mother telling me about my
father’s nightmares – 20, 30 years after he returned from active service he was
still re-living the horror in his dreams.
Nietzsche may
have observed “That which does not kill us makes us stronger” but if it kills
your sons and your brothers and your fathers and your uncles and decimates your
community - only an incredibly over optimistic reading can make that in any way
positive. I am not proposing that we
should all wallow in national self-pity for what might have been. But perhaps on Anzac Day we can at least be
honest and open about what we have lost.
And what we continue to lose every time some young, talented, loved son
or daughter dies because of a war.
